Array!T and find are slow
monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Wed May 14 22:53:45 PDT 2014
On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 04:37:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> enforce(cond, "failure");
>
> really should just translate to something close to
>
> if(!cond) throw new Exception("failure");
>
> but it doesn't do anything close to that. And as long as it
> doesn't, enforce
> is of questionable value in any code that cares about
> efficiency.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
As a workaround, I'm sure we could specialize enforce without
lazy for built-in types?
BTW: Why *is* enforce lazy again? I don't really see it. I makes
more sense for things like "collectException" I guess, but I
don't see it for enforce.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list