[Rosettacode] Growable slices

[bearophile via Digitalmars-d-learn]

Artur Skawina:

> Ugh. So how does it perform wrt the D version that I wrote for
> you last time? [1]

I have done a benchmark with the various version (the first 3 are 
the ones on the Rosettacode site, and the #4 is yours):

lzw1: 0.39
lzw2: 0.17
lzw3: 0.21
lzw4: 0.17

I think your comment was about an older version of the first 
entry, that is non meant to be fast, just short and simple.

I think the second version is enough. Do you agree?

The third version should be more efficient but for such small 
files it's slower than the second.

Bye,
bearophile