Destructor/Finalizer Guarantees

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Wednesday, 12 November 2014 at 14:42:38 UTC, eles wrote:
> Which is why this approach is so cumbersome. At least, in 
> non-GC you only have just one kind of destructor.

It's not necessarily very cumbersome. Standard library usually 
provides necessary integration: 
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bclteam/archive/2005/03/16/396900.aspx