Still not D standard yet ?

ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Sat Nov 29 10:45:51 PST 2014


On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:35:32 +0000
bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com>
wrote:

> On Saturday, 29 November 2014 at 09:03:13 UTC, Ledd wrote:
> > Do you really think that a "system language", or just a 
> > language that aims to be popular, can possibly discard the idea 
> > of getting into an international standard ?
> >
> > I still can't recall any major language that doesn't have a 
> > standard, what is the language/s you are thinking about ?
> 
> C was standardized in 1989. C++ was standardized in 1998.
and both "standards" sux. i won't buy anything that contains "undefined
behavior" in it as any kind of standard. this is pile of shit.

i mean, so-called "standardization by committee" does nothing valuable.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-learn/attachments/20141129/858c04d3/attachment.sig>


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list