RFC on SlidingSplitter Range

["Nordlöw" via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 19:57:31 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
> Be it C, C++ or D, "pre increment is maybe faster, and is never 
> slower".
>
> So as a rule of thumb, unless you should *specifically* require 
> post increment, pre-increment is to be prefered, though in 95% 
> of the cases, it results in the same code.

Ok. Thanks.