Constructor params with same name as members

[via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Thursday, 23 October 2014 at 18:57:33 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 10/22/2014 11:37 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
> > x = x;
> >
> > which is so obviously wrong that I don't know how much of
> anyone could
> > make that mistake. But simply making it illegal to assign a
> variable to
> > itself would solve that problem, and that arguably should be
> done, since
> > it's a essentially a no-op.
>
> Steve said the same thing and it's true for fundamental types 
> but just to annoy you two, assignment can have side effects. :)

But it wouldn't be a no-op then.