Does it make sense to add attribute to operator overload functions ?

[Jkpl via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Saturday, 25 October 2014 at 18:38:12 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> On Saturday, 25 October 2014 at 17:14:51 UTC, Jkpl wrote:
>> Everything is in the Q. I ask this because those functions are 
>> hidden behind symbols and keywords (+=, ~, in, etc.). It's not 
>> that obvious for a user who would write a custom type.
>>
>> e.g:
>> -----------
>> struct myType
>> {
>>    @safe nothrow opIndexAssign(t1 paramValue,t2 paramIndex){}
>> }
>> -----------
>>
>> are the attributes necessary ? Are opXXX functions handled 
>> just like any other functs ? (traversal compat. of the attribs)
>
> In every aspect they are ordinary functions, except they each 
> have an additional unique way of being called (the relevant 
> operator syntax).
>
> In short, yes.

Thx, A bit less confused by them now.