More uses of operator "in"
"Nordlöw" via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Tue Oct 28 08:11:47 PDT 2014
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 14:06:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> No. The implication of 'in' for AAs is that it is a fast,
> O(lgn) or better, operation. Your assertion requires O(n)
> performance.
What about making it work for (builtin) tuples? Then it could be
make use of a variadic std.algorithm: find() or some lazily
defined hash-table.
Maybe it could be part (if not already there) of Kenjis great
tuple improvement PR which is awaiting review and merge.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list