std.algorithm.reduce on an array of structs
via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Thu Sep 11 06:28:36 PDT 2014
On Thursday, 11 September 2014 at 13:06:05 UTC, Colin wrote:
> I have this test code:
>
> struct Thing {
> uint x;
> }
>
> void main(){
> uint[] ar1 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
> auto min1 = ar1.reduce!((a,b) => a < b);
> writefln("%s", min1); // prints 1 as expected
>
> Thing[] ar2 = [Thing(1), Thing(2), Thing(4)];
> auto min2 = ar2.reduce!((a,b) => a.x < b.x); // <- Wont
> Compile
> writefln("%s", min2);
> }
>
> The line with "Wont Compile" on it has this error message:
> /usr/include/dmd/phobos/std/algorithm.d(770): Error: cannot
> implicitly convert expression (__lambda2(result,
> front(_param_1))) of type bool to Thing
> /usr/include/dmd/phobos/std/algorithm.d(791): Error: template
> instance t.main.reduce!((a, b) => a.x < b.x).reduce!(Thing,
> Thing[]) error instantiating
> t.d(16): instantiated from here: reduce!(Thing[])
>
>
> Any idea what I'm doing wrong here?
> To me, the operation on ar2 should be pretty much identical to
> ar1, except for the use of the struct.
I think you want to use `filter()` (for both Thing and uint), not
`reduce()`. The former produces a range with only the elements
that match the predicate, while the latter produces _one_ element
according to the given rules, e.g.
my_int_array.reduce!((result,a) => result+a);
produces the sum of all elements. In your example, the first use
only compiles because `bool` happens to be implicitly convertible
to `uint`.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list