Maxime's micro allocation benchmark much faster ?

[Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 10:35:05 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 10:09:12 UTC, FG wrote:
>> On 2015-03-31 at 22:56, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
>>> 1mm allocations
>>> 2.066: 0.844s
>>> 2.067: 0.19s
>>
>> That is great news, thanks!
>>
>> OT: it's a nasty financier's habit to write 1M and 1MM instead 
>> of 1k and 1M.  :P
>
> Yeah, what's with that? I've never seen it before.

One cannot entirely escape déformation professionnelle ;)  
[People mostly write 1,000 but 1mm although 1m is pedantically 
correct for 1,000).  Better internalize the conventions if one 
doesn't want to avoid expensive mistakes under pressure.