lambda code

[Vlad Levenfeld via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 13:25:47 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 12:49:36 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
>> Is there any way (or could there be any way, in the future) of 
>> getting the code from lambda expressions as a string?
>>
>> I've noticed that if I have an error with a lambda that looks 
>> like, say
>>  x=>x+a
>>
>> the error message will come up referring to it as
>>  (x) => x + a
>>
>> so some level of processing has already been done on the 
>> expression. Can I get at any of it during compilation? It 
>> would be useful for automatic program rewriting.
>
> Short answer: no. .codeof for functions is something I've 
> wanted for ages, but no movement so far.

:(