why cant function parameters be grouped by type ?

[ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 11:49:18 +0000, Baz wrote:

> Is there anything in the grammar that prevents this syntax ?

yes: nameless args. i would like to see 'em burned with napalm, but it 
seems to be too late to do that...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-learn/attachments/20150412/27a9d280/attachment.sig>