post on using go 1.5 and GC latency

[Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 10:47 +0000, via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Yes, Go has sacrificed some compute performance in favour of 
> latency and convenience. They have also released GC improvement 
> plans for 1.6:
> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kBx98ulj5V5M9Zdeamy7v6ofZXX3yPziA
> f0V27A64Mo/edit
> 
> It is rather obvious that  a building a good concurrent GC is a 
> time consuming effort.

But one that Google are entirely happy to fully fund.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-learn/attachments/20150822/d353824f/attachment.sig>