is it bug?

[BBaz via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Friday, 30 January 2015 at 13:34:57 UTC, drug wrote:
> On 30.01.2015 16:31, BBaz wrote:
>> On Friday, 30 January 2015 at 12:32:05 UTC, drug wrote:
>>
>>>    static init()
>>>    {
>>>        auto instance = new typeof(this)();
>>>        instance._cont = new Container();
>>>        return instance;
>>>    }
>>
>> have you tried
>>
>> ---
>>      static typeof(this) init()
>>      {
>>          auto instance = new typeof(this)();
>>          instance._cont = new Container();
>>          return instance;
>>      }
>> ---
>>
>> ?
>>
>> because currently either "void" or a type is missing.
>>
> Type is inferred automatically.

right, i've forgot that init() is a >>built-in<< property.
But it seemsthat i'm not the only one...