is it bug?

[drug via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On 30.01.2015 17:04, BBaz wrote:
>
> Yes, that was the point: "bad idea to call a member "init".
> But I've missed something with inference of return type...
> let's call this the "BMS" : big-mouth-syndrom...
>
> I didn't know it could be ommitted...I thought it could be if the
> function has the'@safe'attribute...
static helps to infer type
>
> Sorry drug, BMS...
>
there is nothing to sorry