Should '@disable this()' disable 'static opCall()'?

[Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On 01/30/2015 03:19 PM, BBaz wrote:

 > It should only be an error when static opCall() cant be distinguishable
 > from this.
 >
 > ---
 > struct S
 > {
 >      @disable this();
 >      static string opCall(){return "yo mister White";}
 > }
 > void main()
 > {}
 > ---
 >
 > is distinguishable (by return type) but cant be compiled.

I agree that this is a problem but return types are not parts of 
function signatures; so return types do not help "distinguish" 
functions. Besides, constructors don't have return types; so it is a 
little bit of a stretch to compare them to functions. :)

 > You're right there's a problem.

Thank you. Filed:

   https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14087

Ali