Emulation macros and pattern matching on D
Dennis Ritchie via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Fri Jun 5 07:15:08 PDT 2015
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 13:13:15 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> string foo(string mode, string value)
> {
> return `writefln("mode ` ~ mode ~ `: %s", ` ~ value ~ `);`;
> }
>
> void main()
> {
> mixin(foo("Y", "3"));
> mixin(foo("X", "2"));
> }
Thanks. It looks really simple, but I still do not understand the
concept of using mixins in full.
I do not understand why in this line:
return `writefln("mode ` ~ mode ~ `: %s", ` ~ value ~ `);`;
use the following syntax:
~ mode ~ , ~ value ~
For example, why here I can simply write:
void main() {
int b = 5;
mixin(`int a = b;`);
assert(a == 5);
}
Why should not I write like this:
void main() {
int b = 5;
mixin(`"int a = " ` ~ b ~ ` ";"`);
assert(a == 5);
}
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list