lambda code

[John Colvin via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 12:49:36 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
> Is there any way (or could there be any way, in the future) of 
> getting the code from lambda expressions as a string?
>
> I've noticed that if I have an error with a lambda that looks 
> like, say
>   x=>x+a
>
> the error message will come up referring to it as
>   (x) => x + a
>
> so some level of processing has already been done on the 
> expression. Can I get at any of it during compilation? It would 
> be useful for automatic program rewriting.

Short answer: no. .codeof for functions is something I've wanted 
for ages, but no movement so far.