Windows Header consts

Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Mon Sep 7 18:39:28 PDT 2015


On Monday, 7 September 2015 at 22:02:47 UTC, Prudence wrote:
>
> Again, it's called progress. Why keep using the same defunct 
> system for endless years simply because that's the way it was 
> done?

Any C library binding should maintain the same interface as the C 
library as much as possible. That way any existing C code can be 
directly ported to D with minimal modification. If you then want 
to build a wrapper on top of that to make it more D-like, that's 
perfectly fine, but the binding itself shouldn't be D-ified.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list