Lazy sort

[deed via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 10:41:16 UTC, ixid wrote:
> Does sort have to be eager or would it be possible to have a 
> lazy version? It's messy to always have to use array and leap 
> in and out of lazy operations within a UFCS chain. Surely as 
> many functions as possible should be optionally lazy.

Wouldn't that mean removing min or max lazily?