Multiple implicit type converters

Bahman Movaqar via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Fri Sep 11 12:31:47 PDT 2015


On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 16:31:46 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> explicit is the only way to go. That's easy to do, just write 
> like a .get method or something that does the conversion and 
> returns it.

Fair enough.  Type conversion is one of those spots that I'd like 
it to as explicit as possible.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list