Multiple implicit type converters
Bahman Movaqar via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Fri Sep 11 12:31:47 PDT 2015
On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 16:31:46 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> explicit is the only way to go. That's easy to do, just write
> like a .get method or something that does the conversion and
> returns it.
Fair enough. Type conversion is one of those spots that I'd like
it to as explicit as possible.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list