Another, is it a bug?

[Meta via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Wednesday, 16 September 2015 at 03:48:59 UTC, Random D user 
wrote:
> Yeah... I guess I was expecting it to overload across class 
> boundaries. I mean there's already a member eat in base class 
> and sub class can't override that since it's got different 
> parameters, and it's a function (can't be variable), so the 
> reasonable thing would be to overload it (which is why I tried 
> override to see if it forces/hints overriding/overloading).
> Instead it creates two ambiguous names of which only one has to 
> be disambiguated to use which seems super error prone. IMO it 
> should just be error/warning.
>
> Given that, normally properties are just overloaded methods in 
> D, it's pretty sad classes break this behavior/convention.

It's the exact same as in Java, and probably C# as well. I don't 
know if there's any OOP language that overloads methods between 
the base and super class.

https://ideone.com/En5JEc