Templated opIndex?

[OlaOst via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Saturday, 19 September 2015 at 10:16:58 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> On Saturday, 19 September 2015 at 09:33:02 UTC, OlaOst wrote:
>> [...]
>
> 2 approaches:
> 1) use a function instead. E.g. test.get!int(0); isn't too bad
> 2) If you really want to use [], do something like this:
>
> [...]

Thanks, option 1 is what I'm using today. It's a little annoying 
though, since templated OpIndexAssign works perfectly.