Question about Object.destroy

[Lambert Duijst via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Sunday, 20 September 2015 at 18:21:52 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> Very simple: destroy(s) (or s.destroy but i prefer destroy(s)) 
> will set the reference it is passed to null because you aren't 
> supposed to use it anymore.
>
> So after calling destroy(s), s is null, so it segfaults when 
> you try to use it.

Oh that surprises me a bit, because I read in the list of 
deprecated features that delete is deprecated and that the right 
thing to do is to use destroy instead.

Also when I print the address of s it gives me some hex number, 
but not 0 (null).
I use writeln("Address of s ", &s) to print the address, not sure 
if that is correct though.
Before and after the explicit destroy I get the same address, 
which is 7FFF549108D8.

Btw I use dmd v2.067 on mac os 10.10.3

Thanks for the quick replies.