Parallel processing and further use of output

[John Colvin via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Monday, 28 September 2015 at 11:31:33 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 14:33 +0200, anonymous via 
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
>> […]
>> I'm pretty sure atomicOp is faster, though.
>
> Rough and ready anecdotal evidence would indicate that this is 
> a reasonable statement, by quite a long way. However a proper 
> benchmark is needed for statistical significance.
>
> On the other hand std.parallelism.taskPool.reduce surely has to 
> be the correct way of expressing the algorithm?

It would be really great if someone knowledgable did a full 
review of std.parallelism to find out the answer, hint, hint...  
:)