No aa.byKey.length?

[Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Monday, April 04, 2016 02:32:56 Yuxuan Shui via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Monday, 4 April 2016 at 00:50:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Sunday, April 03, 2016 23:46:10 John Colvin via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> On Saturday, 2 April 2016 at 16:00:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >>
> >> Maybe
> >>
> >> aa.byKey().takeExactly(aa.length)
> >
> > Yeah, that's a clever workaround.
>
> So should we not add length to byKey?

I don't see any reason for the result of byKey to not have length. It's just
that given that it doesn't currently have length, John's suggestion provides
a way to turn it into a range with length.

- Jonathan M Davis