@property

[Satoshi via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Thursday, 8 December 2016 at 22:09:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> On Thursday, December 08, 2016 16:54:57 Adam D. Ruppe via 
> Digitalmars-d- learn wrote:
>> [...]
>
> Yeah, it's pretty common for folks to slap @property on 
> functions to make it clear that it's intended to be used as a 
> property and thus is a getter or setter. So, it serves a 
> purpose from the standpoint of documentation. But at this 
> point, it doesn't make much differently on the technical level. 
> The differences with typeof and stuff like 
> std.traits.FunctionAttributes are what would be different. You 
> can use the property syntax whether @property was used or not.
>
> [...]


Thank you very much for your detailed explanation.