local const functions - bug ?

[Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Thursday, 7 July 2016 at 12:24:08 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen wrote:
> On Thursday, 7 July 2016 at 10:33:39 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>> this compiles without error:
>>
>>
>> struct Foo
>> {
>>     int i;
>>     void bar()
>>     {
>>         void foo() const
>>         {
>>             i = 1;
>>         }
>>         foo;
>>     }
>> }
>>
>> In this case "const" seems to be a noop. Do you think it's a 
>> bug ? Shouldn't "const" be applied, despite of foo() 
>> inaccessibility ?
>
> Is this related to:
> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1983

I've opened a separate issue, it seems to be another case.