Typesafe variadic functions requiring at least one argument
Michael Coulombe via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Thu Jul 7 07:09:03 PDT 2016
On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 at 19:50:11 UTC, pineapple wrote:
> I'd like to do something like this but it doesn't seem to be
> legal -
>
> void test(int[] ints...) if(ints.length){
> // stuff
> }
>
> Not being able to specify this interferes with how I'd like to
> define my method overloads. What's the best way to achieve what
> I'm looking for?
Is this close enough?
void test(int first, int[] rest...) {
auto ints = only(first).chain(rest);
// stuff
}
void main() {
//test(); // fails to compile
test(1);
test(1,2,3);
}
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list