Why Does Dscanner Warn About a Missing toHash if opEquals is Defined?
Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Sun Jul 31 11:57:50 PDT 2016
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 17:48:48 UTC, BLM768 wrote:
> writeln(n1.hashOf == n2.hashOf); // false = BAD!
Ok, yeah that is bad.
Next question: what's the fastest hashing implementation that
will provide the least collisions? Is there a hash implementation
that's perfered for AAs?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list