core.sys.windows so lean?

[Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 17:11:44 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 16:51:20 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
>> Hmmm...it seems to be missing quite alot though.
>
> You could've mentioned you meant just the winsock modules.
>
> They have not been brought over because they were not 
> explicitly under an open-source license.

:(

(Sorry I didn't realize they were all only in the winsock module)

Weird that you could include the standard windows module but not 
winsock?  Also seems odd that a language including bindings to an 
operating system api would be a licensing issue.