nested inout return type
Era Scarecrow via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Mon Jun 13 16:51:40 PDT 2016
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 22:31:00 UTC, Simon Bürger wrote:
> But as "inout" was invented to make that unneccessary I was
> wondering if there is a clever way to make this work.
>
> <snip>
>
> Slice!(inout(T)) opSlice(size_t a, size_t b) inout
> {
> return Slice!(inout(T))(ptr+a, b-a);
> }
Hmmm. Wouldn't just returning an inout of the Slice work?
Otherwise you'll get inner template instantiation and that can be
annoying
inout(Slice) opSlice(size_t a, size_t b) inout
{
return cast(inout(Slice)) Slice(ptr+a, b-a);
}
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list