what's the right way to get char* from string?
ZombineDev via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Thu May 5 23:04:13 PDT 2016
On Thursday, 5 May 2016 at 07:49:46 UTC, aki wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I need to call C function, often need to
> have char* pointer from string.
>
> "Interfacing to C++" page:
> https://dlang.org/spec/cpp_interface.html
> have following example.
>
> extern (C) int strcmp(char* string1, char* string2);
> import std.string;
> int myDfunction(char[] s)
> {
> return strcmp(std.string.toStringz(s), "foo");
> }
>
> but this is incorrect because toStringz() returns immutable
> pointer.
> One way is to write mutable version of toStringz()
>
> char* toStringzMutable(string s) @trusted pure nothrow {
> auto copy = new char[s.length + 1];
> copy[0..s.length] = s[];
> copy[s.length] = 0;
> return copy.ptr;
> }
>
> But I think this is common needs,
> why it is not provided by Phobos?
> (or tell me if it has)
>
> Thanks,
> aki
In this particular case, if you `import core.stdc.string :
strcmp`, instead of providing your own extern declaration it
should work, because in there the signature is correctly typed as
`in char*` which is essentially the same as `const(char*)` which
can accept both mutable, const and immutable arguments. Also it
has the correct attributes so you can call it from `pure`,
`nothrow` and `@nogc` code.
As others have said, when you do need to convert a string slice
to a pointer to a null terminated char/wchar/dchar string,
`toUTFz` can be very useful.
But where possible, you should prefer functions that take an
explicit length parameter, so you can avoid memory allocation:
```
string s1, s2;
import std.algorithm : min;
import core.stdc.string : strncmp;
strncmp(s1.ptr, s2.ptr, min(s1.length, s2.length));
// (`min` is used to prevent the C function from
// accessing data beyond the smallest
// of the two string slices).
```
Also string slices that point to a **whole** string literal are
automatically null-terminated:
```
// lit is zero-terminated
string lit = "asdf";
assert (lit.ptr[lit.length] == '\0');
assert (strlen(lit.ptr) == lit.length);
```
However you need to be very careful, because as soon as you make
a sub-slice, this property disappears:
```
// slice is not zero-terminated.
string slice = lit[0..2];
assert (slice.ptr[length] == 'd');
assert (strlen(slice.ptr) != slice.length);
```
This means that you can't be sure that a string slice is
zero-termninated unless you can see it in your code that it
points to a string literal and you're sure that it would never be
changed to point to something else (like something returned from
a function).
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list