bug in foreach continue

[Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Friday, 17 March 2017 at 13:53:58 UTC, Hussien wrote:
> Yes, but you have a nested foreach loop. One runtime and one 
> compile time. The break goes with the runtime loop... but 
> NORMAL programming logic tells us that the break goes with the 
> loop that it exists in.

It did. It broke the loop counting the numbers, but continued the 
loop of strings normally.


People have requested a `static foreach` before, but that request 
has not yet been granted.

> They are going to expect them to continue or break out of the 
> inner most loop that they are called from.

That is exactly what they do, and exactly what happened in all 
the examples posted.