Inline assembly question

[Basile B.]

On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 21:27:28 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar 
wrote:
> On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 18:48:02 UTC, Eugene Wissner 
> wrote:
>>>> https://dlang.org/spec/iasm.html#agregate_member_offsets
>>>>
>>>> aggregate.member.offsetof[someregister]
>>>
>>> Sorry I didn't phrase my question accurately. Presumably to 
>>> use above with the mnemonics I would need additional mixin 
>>> templates where the aggregate type and member etc would need 
>>> to be parameters?
>>
>> You can use just string parameters instead of enums, then you 
>> can pass arbitrary arguments to the instructions. The compiler 
>> will tell you if something is wrong with the syntax of the 
>> generated assembly.
>
> Okay thank you. Sigh. It would be so much simpler to be able to 
> just define mnemonics for registers.
>
> Anyway, another question:
>
> Does the compiler generate appropriate unwind information on 
> Win64? Prsumably if a function is marked 'naked' then it 
> doesn't?
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Dibyendu

yeah about stack frame..., also don't forget to mark the asm 
block "pure nothrow" if possible...
It's not documented but the syntax is like that:

```
void foo()
{
     asm pure nothrow
     {
         naked;
         ret;
     }
}

```