What the hell is wrong with D?

[EntangledQuanta]

On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 02:36:50 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 02:16:16 EntangledQuanta via 
> Digitalmars-d- learn wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 21:17:53 UTC, nkm1 wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC, 
>> > EntangledQuanta
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >
>> > There are two issues there; operator precedence and booleans
>> > (_win[0] == '@') being a valid operands to +.
>> > If someone is too stupid to learn how precedence works, they
>> > should consider a different career instead of blaming others.
>> > OTOH, booleans converting to numbers is a very questionable
>> > feature. I certainly have never seen any good use for it. 
>> > This
>> > is just an unfortunate legacy of C, which didn't even have
>> > booleans for a long time.
>>
>> Your an idiot, I know about how operator precedence works far 
>> more than you do. Wanna bet? how much? Your house? your wife? 
>> Your life? It's about doing things correctly, you seem to fail 
>> to understand, not your fault, can't expect a turd to 
>> understand logic.
>
> Please try to be civil. It's fine if you're unhappy about some 
> aspect of how D works and want to discuss it, but we do not 
> condone personal attacks here.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis


But, of course, It's ok for him to come me an idiot. Let me 
quote, not that it matters, since you are biased and a hypocrite:

">> > If someone is too stupid to learn how precedence works, they
>> > should consider a different career instead of blaming 
>> > others."

But when I call him an idiot, I'm put in the corner.

I see how it works around here. What a cult!