Is there a simple way to check if value is null for every case?

[Alex]

On Monday, 27 August 2018 at 19:36:29 UTC, aliak wrote:
>
> Then Nullable!(int*) would be the same as int*. Or even better 
> maybe is to give a compiler error when you try and stuff a 
> nullable type inside a Nullable. Because ... why?
>

Isn't it arguable, whether this is desired? I mean, in the 
present state you can separate the cases, whether the Nullable is 
set or not. This is a feature.
If Nullable!(int*) behaves like int*, it would be somewhat more 
straight forward, which is maybe also a feature. But you loose 
something you can do right now...