Strange things allowed in iasm
Basile B.
b2.temp at gmx.com
Mon Feb 5 08:13:48 UTC 2018
On Sunday, 4 February 2018 at 05:45:02 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> 1/
>
> void foo()
> {
> asm pure nothrow
> {
> naked;
> mov RAX, [0x10][0x20] R8;
> ret;
> }
> }
>
> generates
>
> ;------- SUB 0000000000449468h -------
> 0000000000449468h mov eax, 00000030h
> 000000000044946Dh ret
> ;-------------------------------------
>
>
> 2/
>
> void foo()
> {
> asm pure nothrow
> {
> naked;
> mov RAX, [R9][R10] R8;
> ret;
> }
> }
>
> generates
>
> ;------- SUB 0000000000449468h -------
> 0000000000449468h mov rax, r8
> 000000000044946Bh ret
> ;-------------------------------------
>
>
> IASM Parser bug ?
Decided than it is indeed a bug:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18373
but maybe that the problem happens after parsing.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list