Template Constraints
psychoticRabbit
meagain at meagain.com
Sat Feb 24 04:13:30 UTC 2018
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 03:58:48 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
>
> Whether an implicit cast or an explicit cast makes more sense
> depends entirely on what the code is doing, but either way, the
> conversion needs to be forced inside the function, or you end
> up with bugs. Far too often, when someone has a template
> constraint that checks an implicit conversion, the function
> doesn't actually force the conversion, and that can do anything
> from resulting in some instantiations not compiling to causing
> subtle bugs due to the argument being used without being
> converted. In general, it's actually best to avoid conversions
> entirely with generic code and force the caller to do the
> conversion if a conversion is appropriate.
>
> But ultimately, what works best depends on what the code is
> trying to do.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
yeah it's hard to say much more without knowing what the code
really wants to do..but presumably, you'd want to incorporate
some contract programming in such a solution too, particulary
given there's something potentially dodgy going on within such a
function.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list