mixed in struct constructor is ignored when another (non mixed in) constructor is specified

[Adam D. Ruppe]

On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 14:38:22 UTC, ParticlePeter wrote:
> This cool, I didn't know that we can name mixins when 
> instantiating but also never taught that there could be any 
> purpose for naming. Works, thanks.

oh yes, there's a lot of cool things with mixin. You might want 
to skim my tip of the week index: 
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/totw-index.html and see if more 
jump out at you.

template mixins have behavior that look stupid until you 
understand why - then it gets pretty nice. Like the naming and 
overloading rules allow selective overriding and integration once 
you know how.