Is old style compile-time foreach redundant?
Seb
seb at wilzba.ch
Sun Jan 7 02:20:00 UTC 2018
On Sunday, 7 January 2018 at 01:52:10 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 01/06/2018 04:55 PM, Stefan Koch wrote:
>
> > When you can use the old style do so. Since it puts less
> stress on the
> > compiler in the general case.
>
> My question is related to how to update my book. If the
> difference is mainly about performance, I think I will cover
> 'static foreach' but also mention old style foreach as a note.
>
> Ali
How about doing sth. similar like for DIP1003?
https://dlang.org/spec/contracts.html#pre_post_contracts
> Since DIP1003 has been applied the actual function body starts
> with do. In the past, body was used, and could still be
> encountered in old code bases.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list