Is old style compile-time foreach redundant?

[Timon Gehr]

On 09.01.2018 22:04, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> 	if (0 == 3) {}
> 	// all subsequent iterations deleted
> 
> because the static break is unconditionally compiled (it has nothing to
> do with the runtime branch).  You'd have to use static if to make it
> conditionally-compiled and thus not instantly aborting the loop.
> 
> Such semantics would be logically consistent, but unfortunately rather
> counterintuitive at first glance.

I think "if (0 == 3) { static break; }" should be a compile-time error.