Disabling struct destructor illegal?

[RazvanN]

On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 09:50:32 UTC, Jim Balter wrote:
> On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 08:50:15 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
>> struct A
>> {
>>     int a;
>>     @disable ~this() {}
>> }
>>
>> void main()
>> {
>>     A a = A(2);
>> }
>>
>> Currently, this code yields:
>>
>> Error: destructor `A.~this` cannot be used because it is 
>> annotated with @disable
>>
>> I was expecting that disabling the destructor would make it as 
>> if the struct does not have a destructor
>
> Why? That's not the semantics of @disable. And why would you 
> want that? What are you actually trying to achieve?

I just don't understand why you would ever mark the destructor of 
a struct with @disable. When is that useful? If it's not, why not 
just forbit it?