hasUDA with this

[Ali Çehreli]

On 07/26/2018 09:24 AM, jmh530 wrote:
 > On Thursday, 26 July 2018 at 08:08:17 UTC, Timoses wrote:
 >> On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 21:17:38 UTC, jmh530 wrote:

 >> Regarding this example
 >>
 >> void fun() {
 >>     /*const*/
 >>     {
 >>         double bar;
 >>     }
 >>
 >>     static assert(!is (typeof(bar)));
 >> }
 >>
 >> it would kind of violate that `bar` is declared within its own scoped
 >> block if the static assert failed just because `const` was applied to
 >> the block.
 >
 > I don’t think the const block introduces a new scope.

It doesn't but the scope itself is legal in a nested scope; so, 'const' 
should not remove the scope either.

 > It works at the
 > global level just fine.

It must be because one cannot introduce a nested scope at the global scope:

// illegal
{
     double bar;
}

void main() {
     // legal
     {
         double bar;
     }
}

Ali