Confusion/trying to understand CTFE keywords
David Bennett
davidbennett at bravevision.com
Fri Jun 8 03:51:11 UTC 2018
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 04:58:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
> It would be trivial enough to create a wrapper template so that
> you can do something like
>
> immutable n = ctfe!(foo());
>
> e.g.
>
> template ctfe(alias value)
> {
> enum ctfe = value;
> }
>
Would this be equivalent to using static immutable?
static immutable n = foo();
In this case both the compiletime and runtime values were
calculated using cfte.
Also back to the OP the way I think of enum, static types is like
this:
alias and enum create compiletime stuff from compiletime stuff.
static creates runtime stuff from compiletime stuff.
Is that view valid in most cases?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list