Class qualifier vs struct qualifier

[RazvanN]

Hello,

I'm having a hard time understanding whether this inconsistency 
is a bug or intended behavior:

immutable class Foo {}
immutable struct Bar {}

void main()
{
     import std.stdio : writeln;
     Foo a;
     Bar b;

     writeln("typeof(a): ", typeof(a).stringof);
     writeln("typeof(b): ", typeof(b).stringof);
}

prints:

typeof(Foo): Foo
typeof(Bar): immutable(Bar)


It seems like the class storage class is not taken into account 
which leads to some awkward situations like:

immutable class Foo
{
     this() {}
}

void main()
{
     Foo a = new Foo(); // error: immutable method `this` is not 
callable using a
                        // mutable object
}

To make it work I have to add immutable to both sides of the 
expression : immutable Foo a = new immutable Foo(); this is a 
wonder of redundancy. I already declared the class as immutable 
so it shouldn't be possible to have mutable instances of it (and 
it isn't), however I am forced to write the immutable twice even 
though it is pretty obvious that the class cannot be mutated.