scope(success) lowered to try-catch ?

Cauterite cauterite at gmail.com
Mon Jun 18 07:43:57 UTC 2018


On Monday, 18 June 2018 at 03:58:47 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
> ...

yeah, at an AST level it makes sense why it was implemented like 
this.
it's unfortunate that there's no straightforward way to express 
'finally(success) {'.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list