UCFS does not work for nested functions?

[Bastiaan Veelo]

On Monday, 18 June 2018 at 19:31:39 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> In other words, if UFCS meant that module-level symbols took 
> precedent over local symbols, then it's backwards in terms of 
> which place usually wins. Generally it's the local symbols.

Ah, you mean it would have to be that way to prevent breakage. No 
I would not want it that way.

[...]

> But one thing I will note, is that this is valid today:
>
> void bar(int) {writeln("module");}
>
> void main() {
>      static void bar(int) {writeln("local");}
>      int x;
>      x.bar; // "module"
> }
>
> Adding UFCS support to locals, which one would be the expected 
> call? It's difficult to imagine the local being the lower 
> priority, but it would have to be that way to avoid code 
> breakage.

Thanks, that clarifies it. No turtles for UFCS.