D's type declarations seem to read right to left.

[Nick Sabalausky]

On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 20:07:09 UTC, tipdbmp wrote:
> D's type declarations seem to read right to left.
>
>
> int an_integer;
>
> int[10] an_array_of_10_integers;
> int[10]* a_pointer_to_an_array_of_10_integers = 
> &an_array_of_10_integers;
>
> int*[10] an_array_of_10_pointers_to_integers;
> int*[10]* a_pointer_to_an_array_of_10_pointers_to_integers = 
> &an_array_of_10_pointers_to_integers;
>
> int[3][2] an_array_of_2_arrays_of_3_integers;
> int[string] a_hashtable_with_string_keys_and_integer_values;
>
> int[3][string][2] 
> an_array_of_2_hashtables_with_string_keys_and_array_of_3_integers_values;
>
> int function(float) 
> a_pointer_to_a_function_that_takes_a_float_and_returns_an_integer;
> int function(float)[10] 
> an_array_of_10_functions_that_take_floats_and_return_integers;
>
>
> I think this is a big improvement over C's "spiral" way of 
> reading types: 
> http://www.unixwiz.net/techtips/reading-cdecl.html
> I guess it could've been left to right, but... it's okay.

The way I see it, English "of" flips its operands backwards 
compared to English's [adjective][noun] syntax:

int an_integer;
int* an_integer_pointer;
int[] an_integer_array;
int[3]* an_integer_array(length 3)_pointer;

But granted, in English, "of" is more scalable than 
[adjective][noun].