dxml behavior after exception: continue parsing

[Jesse Phillips]

On Monday, 7 May 2018 at 22:24:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:

> I've been considering adding more configuration options where 
> you say something like you don't care if any invalid characters 
> are encountered, in which case, you could cleanly parse past 
> something like an unescaped &, but you'd then potentially be 
> operating on invalid XML without knowing it and could get 
> undesirable results depending on what exactly is wrong with the 
> XML. I haven't decided for sure whether I'm going to add any 
> such configuration options or how fine-grained they'd be, but 
> either way, the current behavior will continue to be the 
> default behavior.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

I'm not going to ask for that (configuration). I may look into 
cloning dxml and changing it to parse the badly formed XML.